<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Meta on billpg industries™</title><link>https://owl.billpg.com/tags/meta/</link><description>Recent content in Meta on billpg industries™</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© William Godfrey.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://owl.billpg.com/tags/meta/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Farewell, Hackensplat Industries!</title><link>https://owl.billpg.com/hackensplat/</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:00:29 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://owl.billpg.com/hackensplat/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;2009, I registered &amp;ldquo;hackensplat.com&amp;rdquo;. A friend of mine called me &amp;ldquo;Wilhelm von Hackensplat&amp;rdquo; as a joke after my rather loud sneezes. It was about this time I decided to start writing about software development and technology. I liked the idea of having an alter ego. I pictured him as an evil genius, Baron von Hackensplat, and so hackensplat.com was born, an evil genius writing about his evil technologies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That was the idea, but it never really took off in my mind. I would have an idea to write about something but it wouldn&amp;rsquo;t really lend itself to the evil genius persona. As time passed I would got bored with the alter ego and gave up writing for the character, instead just writing as myself. I later changed the name of the website to &amp;ldquo;Hackensplat Industries&amp;rdquo;, mainly so I could keep the name.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The cult of 140</title><link>https://owl.billpg.com/the-cult-of-140/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://owl.billpg.com/the-cult-of-140/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently, women don&amp;rsquo;t understand the offside rule. At least that&amp;rsquo;s according to some TV sports pundit who lost his job recently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t really understand the offside rule either, so I wrote this on my facebook page in response to the news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key to understanding the offside rule is that it doesn&amp;rsquo;t really matter what the rule is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Make up any old rubbish, like &amp;ldquo;Goal keepers must be pipe smokers&amp;rdquo; and call that the offside rule. It is just as meaningful.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>reddit'd (Followup to 'Construct Something Else')</title><link>https://owl.billpg.com/redditd-followup-to-construct-something-else/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://owl.billpg.com/redditd-followup-to-construct-something-else/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://owl.billpg.com/images/s200_2894318763_dc8f349691_o.jpg" data-align="right" width="157" height="200" /&gt;Fame at last! Fame at last! My last piece, &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://owl.billpg.com/construct-something-else-c/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Construct something else!&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rdquo; got a bit of attention when someone posted it &lt;a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/dd9sa/construct_something_else_c/"&gt;on reddit&lt;/a&gt;.That was unexpected. Remember the rule; If you publish something that&amp;rsquo;s a bad idea in hindsight, post a &amp;ldquo;clarification&amp;rdquo; article claiming you&amp;rsquo;ve been misunderstood and that you never thought it was a good idea in the first place. Then hide in the shower. You see, I think I&amp;rsquo;ve been misunderstood. I was reading stackoverflow and I found the question asking about c# constructors. There was the comment from Eric Lippert, talking about the possibility of implementing this feature, but they were lacking a good reason to undertake the effort. Then I remembered I had exactly what he was looking for, a real-world use case! So I wrote up my experiences in a blog post and left a comment on the stack overflow question. I thought I was rather clear that I was just providing Mr Lippert with a use case, rather than actually advocating it. Nonetheless, some people mistakenly took my post as advocacy and responded as such. Now if you&amp;rsquo;ll excuse me, I&amp;rsquo;m going to go have a shower.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>